The Walna Scar Road – To Drive Or Not to Drive

Not long ago on my return from an outing in the Coniston Fells I chanced on a reporter and cameraman from ITV News filming on the reduce component of the Walna Scar Road. Walna Scar won’t on the experience of it feel the most newsworthy area or even the most fascinating to film nevertheless it transpired that the cause for their presence was the point that the road had just that incredibly early morning been shut to motorised traffic.

I experienced been below the impact that this road was only open up to walkers, cyclists and horse riders but this – until that early morning – was not the scenario. In simple fact there have been quite a few courtroom disputes to identify the status of Walna Scar and equivalent actions are in development more than the Garburn Move in the jap Lakes.

On the deal with of it you may talk to who would want to drive over tracks such as these as carrying out so would definitely hurt the average automobile with no promise of building it about to the much facet. It seems though that organizations featuring off highway driving experiences are the key opponents to targeted visitors no cost position and I can see their aspect of the argument – they require someplace to be capable to offer you their providers as do those who give off street motor biking and quad biking visits.

This delivers us into a discussion equivalent to that in excess of the 10 knot speed limit imposed on Windermere in 2005 which effectively banished the electrical power boats and water skiers from the lake. They were being not banned as these but 10 knots (a lot less than 12 mph) is insufficient velocity to water ski or have any variety of entertaining in a electric power boat so they went somewhere else. The ban was unpopular among watersports enthusiasts but at the stop of the day some of their routines ended up a hazard to other lake people.

My own feeling in favour of the ban is centered on the fact that if I stroll or trip my bicycle up this observe I am neither endangering other consumers, leading to distress to livestock or wildlife or inflicting an undue amount of money of injury to the keep track of itself. As shortly as a person drives a motor car or truck up here however this would not be the case. Pretty aside from the physical danger to others there is the aspect of sounds to look at. Our most important roads and towns are plagued by traffic sound and air pollution and We come to spots these types of as the Lakeland Fells to escape this kind of items as the roaring of engines.

I never faux to have an respond to that will maintain all people content here which is why the scenario is going via the courts but the Forestry Commission run a excellent method on their forest roadways. The routes are closed to non-public motor targeted visitors but are open for use by walkers, cyclists and – as considerably as I know – horse riders but the Forestry Commission’s individual logging autos use the streets for entry to timber and other consumers need to give way to them if encountered. In the circumstance of Walna Scar and other contended routes I would advise a identical arrangement whereby farmers and the unexpected emergency expert services can use the highway – in addition to quarry motor vehicles in the scenario of Walna Scar – but with the routes remaining closed to private motor traffic.

I may well not agree with the motorised end users right here but I have at the very least outlined their place of check out. For the legal arguments which I will not endeavor to describe I have placed a connection at the finish of this post to GLEAM who are a pressure team who marketing campaign through the lawful process to keep motor vehicles off our green lanes and byways so preserving them as a safe and sound area for walkers, cyclists and horse riders.